Spotify recently addressed Drake’s legal petition surrounding Kendrick Lamar’s track, “Not Like Us,” and denied all accusations. The rapper alleged that Spotify and Universal Music Group (UMG) had used bots and deceptive practices to boost the song’s performance. However, Spotify firmly called these claims “false” and “speculative.”
The streaming platform filed its response in Manhattan court, stating, “The entire basis of the petitioner’s request is untrue.” Spotify also criticized Drake’s legal approach, arguing that using a petition—instead of filing an actual lawsuit—was an attempt to sidestep normal legal procedures. They called his accusations extraordinary and claimed there was no valid evidence to back them up. “This attempt to bypass standard judicial processes should be rejected,” their motion stated.
UMG hasn’t yet responded in court but previously dismissed the allegations. They asserted that fans, not companies, determine which songs rise to popularity. Spotify echoed this sentiment, adding that claims involving the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act are notoriously hard to prove without solid evidence. They further argued that Drake’s petition was built on internet speculation and anonymous claims, lacking real support.
David Kaefer, Spotify’s VP of Music, filed an affidavit emphasizing the company’s efforts to combat streaming fraud. He explained that Spotify actively invests in detecting and stopping artificial streaming. Their measures include removing manipulated streams, adjusting chart rankings, withholding royalties, and issuing penalties. “These actions ensure that honest artists are rewarded fairly,” Kaefer noted.
Drake’s legal team argued that if Spotify and UMG had nothing to hide, they should comply with the basic discovery request. This dispute highlights growing conflicts between major players in the music industry. While it remains unclear if this case will progress further, it has certainly intensified scrutiny over streaming practices.