Drake recently filed a legal petition against Universal Music Group (UMG) and Spotify, accusing them both of using questionable tactics to inflate streaming numbers for Kendrick Lamar’s diss track, “Not Like Us.” According to Drake’s team, these tactics include deploying bots, paying influencers, and manipulating search algorithms to mislead users.
The petition, submitted through his company Frozen Moments LLC, also claims the label violated the RICO Act and engaged in false advertising. Drake’s lawyers allege that UMG gave Spotify discounted licensing rates to promote “Not Like Us” to users searching for unrelated content. They even accuse UMG of paying Apple to trick Siri into directing users to the track instead of Drake’s own music. The diss track includes a provocative lyric calling Drake a “certified pedophile,” sparking further tension between the artists.
Drake has reportedly tried to address these issues privately with UMG, but he claims the label refused to take responsibility. Instead, UMG allegedly blamed Lamar and threatened to sue him if Drake pursued legal action. UMG denied all accusations, calling them absurd and offensive. A spokesperson stated, “Fans choose the music they want to hear,” and emphasized their commitment to ethical practices.
This legal drama follows a public rap feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar earlier this year, which saw both artists releasing diss tracks aimed at each other. For now, Drake’s petition allows him to gather evidence before moving forward with a lawsuit. However, the case is already drawing attention to the role of streaming platforms in shaping music popularity.
The dispute shines a light on growing tensions in the music industry and raises questions about transparency in streaming practices. Fans and industry insiders alike will be watching to see where this showdown leads.
Related stories
Spotify Fires Back at Drake Over Bot Allegations in Kendrick Lamar Streaming Dispute